|
1
|
- August 22, 1997
- Karin Busch Zetterberg, ValueScope AB
|
|
2
|
- The right variables in the questionnaire
- A good administrative technique
- Feedback to everybody, but not of everything
- A serious will to learn from the results and change behavior
|
|
3
|
- Every employee should get a chance to take part in the survey
- This gives managers results they cannot explain away as unsatisfactory
sampling
- If sampling is needed, it is better to sample workplaces than employees
|
|
4
|
- Year 1: Survey and feedback
- Year 2: Implementation of changes needed
- Year 3: New survey to see results
- et cetera
|
|
5
|
- This can be arranged in different ways (for example lunch-room
interviews, Intranet, mail questionnaires)
- Advantage 1: it shows that Shell considers the answers from the
employees important and allows working time
- Advantage 2: high response rates
|
|
6
|
- DRAFT EXECUTIVE REPORTS Narrative. For boards & headquarters. Final
version is client´s formulations.
- LOCAL ESTABLISHENT FEEDBACK Charts comparing units and divisions. Local
transformation champions (LTCs) run sessions with the local management
with these charts.
- WORK GROUP FEEDBACK
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Heads of units run their own feed-back sessions with their co-workers
- Concentration on own department and own problems, not your neighbor´s or
total Shell
- Direct link to business targets and company goals
|
|
9
|
- Heads of units run their own feed-back sessions with their co-workers
- Positive, specific and immediate feedback
- Discussion of survey results
- Decision of which two or three problems to give priority due to survey
results
|
|
10
|
- The employees answer the questions honestly if they are confident that
their anonymity is insured
- Absolutely no link to personnel records
- No possibility to identify any individual employee in the survey
- All results should be based on at least 10 persons
- Restricted access to database
|
|
11
|
- The results should not be used to point out a department with problems
to other than the manager and his/her manager at a higher level
|
|
12
|
- Short
- Varied question types (illustrations may be included)
- Pleasant layout
- Anonymous - no names on the questionnaires
- (Checking of participation can be done separately)
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Combination of questions may be used to make the “invisible contract”
visible
- Questions may be combined to reveal mismatch between management values
and employee values
- Cluster analysis of companies to form a Shell world map
- A management theory for executive training at Shell
|